Skip to content
caseStudyHeaderBanner

Building Operational Continuity For A Global Delivery Organisation

  • Business Continuity
  • Alternate Site Readiness
  • Recovery Testing

A Large Shared Services And Global Delivery Centre Supporting International Clients.

The Centre Delivers Finance, Procurement And Technology Operations For International Client Organisations From Campuses In Two Cities. Client Contracts Carry Continuity Obligations Covering Not Only Systems But Staffed Capacity, So Any Disruption To People Or Premises Is A Contractual Matter As Much As A Technical One.

Company Profile

  • 02 Delivery Campuses
  • 7500+ Operations Seats

Problem Statement

Continuity Commitments Made In Contracts But Never Rehearsed.

problmStatmntMainPic
problmStatmntSubPic1
problmStatmntSubPic2
problmStatmntSubPic3

CHALLENGES FACED

As Client Contracts Grew More Prescriptive About Continuity Obligations, The Centre Encountered Several Challenges: With Plans Written During Bids And Filed Afterwards, Nobody Had Confirmed Whether Any Of Them Would Work In Practice.

icon
Proving Continuity To Clients

Contractual Commitments Existed On Paper With No Exercise Evidence Behind Them.

icon
Relocating Staffed Capacity

No Arrangement Existed To Move Operations Seats Between Campuses At Short Notice.

icon
Recovering Client Systems

Each Client Environment Had Different Recovery Arrangements And Differing Documentation Quality.

Existing System : Continuity Plans Written For Bids, Not For Use

Plans Were Produced During Contract Negotiation, Approved And Then Filed. They Named Roles That Had Since Changed, Referenced Systems That Had Been Replaced And Assumed Alternate Capacity That Was Now Fully Occupied. No Exercise Had Ever Tested Whether Staff Could Actually Work From The Second Campus.

Result :

Continuity The Centre Can Demonstrate.

caseStudyResult

Every Client Engagement Now Carries A Current Continuity Plan With Defined Recovery Targets, Identified Alternate Capacity And A Completed Exercise Record. Client Audits Are Answered With Drill Evidence Rather Than Documents, And Operations Teams Have Physically Worked From The Alternate Campus Rather Than Assuming They Could.

100%

Engagements Plan Covered

06

Hour Seat Relocation

12

Exercises Completed Yearly

98%

Client Audit Pass Rate

ourApproachCaseStudy1

Continuity Was Rebuilt Around What Actually Fails - Access To A Building, Availability Of Staff, Or A System Outage - Rather Than Around Document Structure. Each Client Engagement Now Has Named Owners, Reserved Alternate Capacity And Scheduled Exercises Covering All Three Failure Modes.

Our Approach: Rehearsed Continuity Across People, Sites & Systems

ourApproachCaseStudy1
ourApproachCaseStudy2

IMPACT & RESULTS

Demonstrable Client Assurance
Proven Seat Relocation
Current, Owned Plans
Consistent Client Environments
Faster Incident Decisions
Continuity As A Commercial Strength

Demonstrable Client Assurance

Continuity Questions During Client Audits And Renewals Are Answered With Exercise Records Rather Than Plan Documents. Prospective Clients Reviewing Delivery Capability See Evidence Of Rehearsed Recovery Rather Than Contractual Language Alone.

frameworks

TECHNOLOGIES - TOOLS USED

Continuity Runs On A Plan Management Platform Holding Engagement Level Plans, Owners And Exercise Records. Replication And Backup Tooling Covers Client Systems By Recovery Tier, While Access Provisioning, Virtual Desktop Capacity And Notification Tooling Support Relocation Of Staffed Operations Between Campuses.

  • Continuity Plan Management
  • Business Impact Analysis
  • Storage Replication
  • Backup & Recovery
  • Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
  • Alternate Site Capacity
  • Access Provisioning
  • Mass Notification
  • Exercise Management
  • Audit Evidence Repository
  • Continuity Dashboards
×
×
×
×